What causes entrepreneurs to fail?
It's a question that comes up a lot when working with clients who are struggling to build their businesses. Even new business owners who are doing well often feel that they are close to the edge of insolvency and are frustrated by how quickly (or rather, how slowly) their businesses are growing. Obviously, starting and growing a new enterprise is challenging, or everyone would be doing it. By where does that challenge come from?
Aside from the many logistical obstacles (capital, training, economic viability, etc.), one of the main struggles is psychological. This is an area that most new entrepreneurs don't prepare for, and subsequently, it becomes one of the main reasons that they fail. Being an entrepreneur requires a different psychological skill set than most other career paths. One of the key concepts that is critical for successful entrepreneurs to understand is:
Business growth is non-linear.
As humans, we are are comfortable with linear relationships. For example, if I kick a soccer ball and it goes 50 feet, I expect that when I kick it twice as hard it will go twice as far. In the professional world, we expect someone who has worked at a job longer to have more skills and be more competent. In fact, the traditional idea of career advancement is very linear - as someone grew older, it was expected that they would gain skills and experience and rise in their organization into positions of more authority and more compensation.
This is why it's disorienting for new entrepreneurs when they realize that the growth model for their new company isn't linear - especially in the short-term. Business grow in a non-linear fashion that usually looks something like this:
The linear path (the straight line from the bottom left to the top right) defines what we normally expect: one unit of effort equals one unit of return. For anyone who has worked a job for an hourly wage, this makes sense: "I get paid x dollars for every hour I work". The line that starts under that linear trajectory but eventually curves above it is the path that most entrepreneurial ventures follow: in the beginning of a new business the input outweighs the return, but eventually the growth of the business means that less effort and time are needed for increasingly large returns.
The pivot point is the critical point - it's where the enterprise goes from being a time and energy "drain" to a leveraged organization. It's where entrepreneurs are able to find the "entrepreneurial payoff" in which they are compensated well above what the linear path would have dictated. This also makes up for the beginning when they were losing out on return by choosing the entrepreneurial path.
It's important to realize that this is a visual representation, but not necessarily a mathematical one. (I'm not much of a mathematician as it is.) While we are using a graphical visual, it doesn't mean that there are hard and clear equations which govern how it looks. In fact, it's inherently non-quantifiable. This is one of the most important parts of the entrepreneurial journey, because it's not possible to define the pivot point. It's often possible to define a break-even point financially, but it's not possible to define when it will occur. Anyone who tells you that they have hard and fast way to determine this is trying to sell you something.
If you can't define the exact path of the non-linear growth, what's the value of looking at this chart? It's main benefit is psychological. The more awareness you can bring to the psychological pitfalls of entrepreneurship, the more you can prepare ourselves for them. As more people are beginning their own entrepreneurial ventures, it becomes critical to understand that building a business doesn't work like other "jobs". This can be incredibly valuable for small service-oriented "solopreneurs" who are making a go of it on their own.
One of the common reasons new businesses fail is that entrepreneurs feel that they aren't getting the results that they "should" be getting. They become frustrated and they give up, often just before they are about to hit the pivot point and see success. That doesn't mean that every entrepreneurial effort will succeed given enough time. It's quite possible that the pivot point is so far in the future as to be practically impossible to reach, or that there isn't enough capital or knowledge to get to that point. This does, however, illustrate three critical mindsets that every entrepreneur has to inculcate:
1. There is a difference between the direct results we are used to and the non-linear nature of business development. Most of the physical world follows a path of direct results; we think that with every additional unit of energy, we should get an additional unit of result. New businesses don't grow that way, so don't get frustrated (because frustration just leads to unhappiness and bad decision-making).
2. Be ready to invest the time and energy in your new venture, if you aren't willing or able to get through it, don't start. And if you are in the thick of it but you don't want to invest more effort, get out! You'll just be throwing money and time away, and you won't get to the point of positive return.
3. The pivot point is inherently unknowable because there are so many variables that influence it. It can depend on industry and profession, and it depends on revenue vs. expense. But keep looking for ways to accelerate towards the pivot point - look for activities that are truly investments in your business like relationship building and brand awareness - they'll have a positive impact down the line.
Building your own business can have huge rewards, both financially and emotionally. But there is an investment to be made up front. The more aware you are of the mental challenges of entrepreneurship, the more you'll be able to prepare for them, and the more likely you are to succeed!
David J.P. Fisher is a business coach and president of RockStar Consulting, a personal development company dedicated to helping people become RockStars in their professional and personal lives. He can be contacted at dfish
View the Original article